[Bug middle-end/63518] New: missing Wuninitialized warning independent of order of arguments
manu at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Mon Oct 13 00:51:00 GMT 2014
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63518
Bug ID: 63518
Summary: missing Wuninitialized warning independent of order of
arguments
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: manu at gcc dot gnu.org
typedef int Timeout;
void wait(Timeout, bool);
void wait2(Timeout, bool);
bool setTimeout(Timeout &t)
{
t = 5;
return true;
}
void foo(void)
{
Timeout t;
wait(t, setTimeout(t));
}
void bar(void)
{
Timeout t;
wait2(setTimeout(t),t);
}
At least one of the both variants should give a warning. Ideally, both should.
Clang warns for the first variant.
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list