[Bug c++/60417] [DR 1518] Bogus error on C++03 aggregate initialization

[redi at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60417

--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I think Daniel's question is tangential because the testcase can be modified
like so:

  B b{};

Or like so:

struct A { explicit A(int = 0); };
struct B { int i; A a; };

int main()
{
  B b = { 1 };
}

Now whether B has an explicit default ctor is irrelevant. This bug is about
whether the missing initializer-clause for b.a is equivalent to {} or A{}, and
as I said in PR 60416, [dcl.init.aggr]/7 has an example indicating that the
answer is A{}, so I think the testcase is clearly valid, whatever the
resolution of DR 1518 or Daniel's question.