[Bug c/59193] Unused postfix operator temporaries

[mtewoodbury at gmail dot com]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59193

Max TenEyck Woodbury <mtewoodbury at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|INVALID                     |---
           Severity|minor                       |trivial

--- Comment #8 from Max TenEyck Woodbury <mtewoodbury at gmail dot com> ---
Re: Manuel López-Ibáñez

Yes, as soon as I feel that my efforts will not be ignored, as they have been
so far...

Re:  Jakub Jelinek

You admit that different 'tree codes' are generated, so there is a difference
between the two sequences.  You further admit that -O0 does do some
optimization, otherwise the machine code emitted would store and discard
the temporary value because that is what the language standard says should
happen.  While this is quite trivial in practice, it shows that you place
your opinion over the exact semantics called for by the standard and lack
the ability to see that.  That is distinctly disturbing.