[Bug c++/60258] Member initialization for atomic fail.

[ja.gcc.bugzilla at aptsketch dot com]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60258

--- Comment #2 from ja.gcc.bugzilla at aptsketch dot com ---
auto foo() -> void
vs
void foo()

is more of just a stylistic issue. There is nothing wrong with both. To me both
are good.

The bug is about std::atomic member initialization. Where if there is member
initialization std::atomic_size_t x{10} the compiler chokes on it.