[Bug c++/60215] [4.9 Regression] ICE with invalid bit-field size
paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Mon Feb 17 11:01:00 GMT 2014
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60215
Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> ---
Evidently, in case of error recovery we can get here:
9672 case COMPONENT_REF:
9673 if (is_overloaded_fn (t))
9674 {
9675 /* We can only get here in checking mode via
9676 build_non_dependent_expr, because any expression that
9677 calls or takes the address of the function will have
9678 pulled a FUNCTION_DECL out of the COMPONENT_REF. */
9679 gcc_checking_assert (allow_non_constant);
9680 *non_constant_p = true;
9681 return t;
9682 }
with allow_non_constant == false. Jason suggested the comment (and the assert
;) as part of the fix for 58647, thus I would like to hear from him... Shall we
maybe || errorcount ? Seems safe for 4.9.0.
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list