[Bug debug/61013] [4.9/4.10 Regression] Option parsing difference between < 4.9 and 4.9

[rth at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61013

Richard Henderson <rth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |rth at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #9 from Richard Henderson <rth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8)
> So, my preference would be to revert to the 4.8 and older behavior, or if
> there really is consensus that -g1 -g should mean -g2 rather than -g1, at
> least change it so that -g3 -g means -g3 (so revert your change and
> for *arg == '\0' instead of the 4.8:
>       if (!opts->x_debug_info_level)
>         opts->x_debug_info_level = DINFO_LEVEL_NORMAL;
> do:
>       if (opts->x_debug_info_level < DINFO_LEVEL_NORMAL)
>         opts->x_debug_info_level = DINFO_LEVEL_NORMAL;

I agree on both points.