[Bug c/36750] -Wmissing-field-initializers relaxation request

[nightstrike at gmail dot com]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36750

--- Comment #8 from nightstrike <nightstrike at gmail dot com> ---
Are you sure C++ works like that?  I thought that member variables in a struct
would get default initialized to indeterminate values, as seen here:

http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/default_initialization

Surely, the C++ syntax of saying MyType x = {}; should be supported, as seen
here:

http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/aggregate_initialization

where for instance:

struct S {
    int a;
    float b;
    std::string str;
};

S s = {}; // identical to S s = {0, 0.0, std::string};

That shouldn't warn for the reasons stated in earlier comments.