[Bug c++/57926] Atomic functions broken with C++ but not C?

[jason at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57926

--- Comment #15 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to lailavrazda1979 from comment #14)
> Why wait? I'm not hugely opposed, but bugfixes are bugfixes, and one more
> fixed bug makes a better 4.9 release, right?

Because all changes risk introducing new bugs, and we're very close to 4.9 now.