[Bug ipa/60761] [4.9 Regression] Names of all function clones in g++ are "<built-in>", in both warnings and dumps

[manu at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60761

--- Comment #7 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5)
> 
> does former_clone_of apply recursively?  Thus can we have a clone of a clone?
> Is there a way to "pretty-print" the kind of clone?  That is, say
> <clone with foo = 1> for a ipa-cp clone with parameter foo replaced by 1?

Why would you want to do that? At least for diagnostics to the users (not debug
dumps), that the function is a clone is an internal implementation detail.