[Bug c++/56709] Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test?

Markus.Elfring at web dot de gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Sun Mar 24 14:48:00 GMT 2013


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56709

Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring at web dot de> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|INVALID                     |

--- Comment #3 from Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring at web dot de> 2013-03-24 14:48:24 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> What is the question?

1. Why do I get error messages about "undefined references" here?

2. Should the shown commands be equivalent?


> You've only shown one GCC command, what is the other one?

>From ~/Projekte/OpalVoip/OPAL/3.10.10/config.log:
configure:6101: g++ -o conftest  -Wall -Wextra -Wstrict-aliasing -Wfloat-equal
-Wno-comment -Wno-unused -Winit-self -Wno-missing-field-initializers -DP_64BIT
-DPTRACING=1 -D_REENTRANT -D_GNU_SOURCE=1 -fexceptions -I/usr/local/include
-I/usr/include/SDL   -felide-constructors -Wreorder -fPIC -DP_64BIT
-DPTRACING=1 -D_REENTRANT -D_GNU_SOURCE=1 -fexceptions -I/usr/local/include
-I/usr/include/SDL   -felide-constructors -Wreorder   -DP_64BIT -DPTRACING=1
-D_REENTRANT -D_GNU_SOURCE=1 -fexceptions -I/usr/local/include
-I/usr/include/SDL   conftest.cpp  -L/usr/local/lib64 -lpt_s -lrt -lsasl2
-lldap -llber -lldap_r -lssl -lcrypto -lexpat -llua -lSDL -lpthread -lodbc
-lresolv -ldl   >&5



(In reply to comment #2)

It seems that no other software developer was interested so far to add
constructive feedback for this issue on the mailing list.



More information about the Gcc-bugs mailing list