[Bug tree-optimization/56522] [4.8 Regression] Bytemark ASSIGNMENT 9% / 11% slower
rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Mon Mar 11 08:45:00 GMT 2013
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56522
--- Comment #14 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-03-11 08:45:04 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> There is almost no difference with reduced test case. Assignment in nbench can
> be tested with:
> ./nbench -cCOM.DAT
>
> where file COM.DAT has content:
>
> ALLSTATS=F
> DONUMSORT=F
> DOSTRINGSORT=F
> DOBITFIELD=F
> DOEMF=F
> DOFOUR=F
> DOASSIGN=T
> DOIDEA=F
> DOHUFF=F
> DONNET=F
> DOLU=F
>
> Which CPU have you tested?
processor : 7
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 30
model name : Intel(R) Core(TM) CPU 860 @ 2.80GHz
stepping : 5
note that there were _zero_ assembly differences with/without the patch
apart from using different register numbers and one single switched
bb order.
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list