[Bug c++/55135] Segfault of gcc on a big file

rguenther at suse dot de gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Wed Mar 6 12:14:00 GMT 2013


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55135

--- Comment #26 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> 2013-03-06 12:14:03 UTC ---
On Wed, 6 Mar 2013, steven at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:

> 
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55135
> 
> Steven Bosscher <steven at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
> 
>            What    |Removed                     |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>       Known to work|                            |4.6.3
>       Known to fail|                            |4.7.2, 4.8.0
> 
> --- Comment #24 from Steven Bosscher <steven at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-03-06 12:09:26 UTC ---
> (In reply to comment #23)
> > PR47344 tracks the regression property of this bug.
> 
> ?! This is also a regression from GCC 4.6 (commen #5), how in the world 
> does that qualify as an "old regression"?

Ah, just because nobody has tried 4.5 doesn't say it isn't a regression
in 4.6!

(what is a regression in compile-time / memory-usage?  technically
I'd say if T2 > T1 or M2 > M1 it's a regression ... welcome to
the world of an ever increasing number of open "regressions")



More information about the Gcc-bugs mailing list