[Bug c/57681] New: Possible missing break in cp-array-notation.c
dcb314 at hotmail dot com
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Sun Jun 23 06:38:00 GMT 2013
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57681
Bug ID: 57681
Summary: Possible missing break in cp-array-notation.c
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
I just ran the static analysis tool "cppcheck" over
the trunk source code dated 20130623.
It said
[trunk/gcc/cp/cp-array-notation.c:471] ->
[trunk/gcc/cp/cp-array-notation.c:473]: (warning) Variable 'init' is reassigned
a value before the old one has been used. 'break;' missing?
Source code is
case BUILT_IN_CILKPLUS_SEC_REDUCE_MIN_IND:
case BUILT_IN_CILKPLUS_SEC_REDUCE_MAX_IND:
code = an_type == BUILT_IN_CILKPLUS_SEC_REDUCE_MAX_IND ? LE_EXPR
: GE_EXPR;
init = an_loop_info[0].var;
case BUILT_IN_CILKPLUS_SEC_REDUCE:
init = identity_value;
break;
Suggest add break statement.
Also, case BUILT_IN_CILKPLUS_SEC_REDUCE is the only case that doesn't
assign to code. That might be a bug.
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list