[Bug debug/55059] [4.8 Regression] DWARF missing concrete class definition

jason at gcc dot gnu.org gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Thu Jan 31 17:48:00 GMT 2013


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55059

Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |ASSIGNED
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2013-01-31
         AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot       |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
                   |gnu.org                     |
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-01-31 17:48:15 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> I believe the patch was trying to avoid treating a partial definition as a full
> definition when there's a full definition of the class in another CU.  If
> there's only the partial definition, the best we can do is to use that.

I was wrong; the patch was just trying to avoid pretending that a partial
definition is a full definition.  Which would be fine except that GCC is being
too aggressive about pruning class members.



More information about the Gcc-bugs mailing list