[Bug c/56153] False warning about signed and unsigned type in conditional expression

[d.daniel at propharma dot ch]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56153

d.daniel at propharma dot ch changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID

--- Comment #4 from d.daniel at propharma dot ch 2013-01-30 19:35:14 UTC ---
I used -W -Wall -Wextra, but actually the warning itself is not false, since in

exp1 ? exp2 : exp3

the conditional expression has a return type that depends on exp3 what exp2
needs to be convertible to. So this warning is generally correct but could be
more precise.
Sorry for the invalid bug report.