[Bug lto/56061] [4.8 Regression] ICE in lto1 (in inline_call, at ipa-inline-transform.c:267)

d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Wed Jan 30 13:40:00 GMT 2013


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56061

--- Comment #7 from Dmitry Gorbachev <d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com> 2013-01-30 13:39:37 UTC ---
> The other way around, compiling and installing with
> -O2 but then at link time use -O0 -g to get a debug
> build is more questionable

> However, I still don't see the point of "-O0 -flto"
> at link-time. We should either force it to be at
> least -O1 or (in my opinion better) give an error.

I think it could make sense. For example, I compile a certain static library
with `-O3 -flto', without `-g' (it's considered already debugged) and without
`-fno-fat-lto-objects' (so it can be used either with or without LTO); it is
shared between several programs. The programs have their own static libs, which
are compiled with `-g -O1 -flto -fno-fat-lto-objects' (could be `-O0', but
doesn't work, PR55102). Then, they are linked using `-g -O0 -flto' to get a
(partially) debug enabled program, or with `-O3 -flto' for a fully optimized
program.

> the docs have this example

Yes, but there is an aforementioned bug 55102.



More information about the Gcc-bugs mailing list