[Bug tree-optimization/56118] New: No constant propagation in vector field assignment
glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Sat Jan 26 17:37:00 GMT 2013
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56118
Bug #: 56118
Summary: No constant propagation in vector field assignment
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: glisse@gcc.gnu.org
Target: x86_64-linux-gnu
Hello,
with this code:
#include <x86intrin.h>
__m128d f(){
__m128d r={3,4};
r[0]=1;
r[1]=2;
return r;
}
gcc sees the following and fails to optimize it:
r = { 3.0e+0, 4.0e+0 };
BIT_FIELD_REF <r, 64, 0> = 1.0e+0;
BIT_FIELD_REF <r, 64, 64> = 2.0e+0;
Nothing fixes it at the RTL level either, so we end up with:
movapd .LC0(%rip), %xmm0
movlpd .LC1(%rip), %xmm0
movhpd .LC2(%rip), %xmm0
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list