[Bug tree-optimization/56365] Missed opportunities for smin/smax standard name patterns

[olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56365

--- Comment #2 from Oleg Endo <olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-02-18 20:04:40 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> I see, at -O2, on x86_64 in 070t.phiopt:
> 
> test_04 (int a, int b)
> {
>   int D.1744;
>   int D.1741;
>   int _3;
>   int _4;
> 
>   <bb 2>:
>   _3 = MIN_EXPR <a_1(D), 127>;
>   _4 = MAX_EXPR <_3, -128>;
>   return _4;
> 
> }

Ah yes, now I see that here, too.  I don't know where or how I was looking,
sorry.