[Bug sanitizer/55309] gcc's address-sanitizer 66% slower than clang's

[howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55309

--- Comment #42 from Jack Howarth <howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu> 2013-02-12 14:41:56 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #41)

FYI, most of the codegen issues with xplor-nih compiled with gfortran can be
suppressed with -fno-tree-vectorize at -O3 (hence my interest in a function
libasan on darwin).