[Bug fortran/59411] Problem with TYPE(C_PTR) constant initialization

[janus at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59411

--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to mrestelli from comment #4)
> type(t), parameter :: pp = suitable_initialization_expr_for_type_t
> type(t), parameter :: p2 = pp
> 
> I would assume that, provided the first assignment is correct, the
> second one is always correct, whatever the definition of type(t). Am I
> right?

I would think so. It is important, though, that pp is a PARAMETER.