[Bug fortran/58276] "make install-host" gfortran is not functional
baker at usgs dot gov
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Thu Aug 29 23:53:00 GMT 2013
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58276
--- Comment #4 from Larry Baker <baker at usgs dot gov> ---
I suppose a different way of asking whether this should be considered a bug is
to ask what should gfortran's behavior be when libgfortran.spec is missing? Is
the correct behavior to continue with the link step as though libgfortran.spec
were empty? Which, I assume, would require the link command to specify all its
libraries explicitly.
Do you think this is really just gfortran being overly picky?
Larry Baker
US Geological Survey
650-329-5608
baker@usgs.gov
On 29 Aug 2013, at 4:43 PM, Larry Baker wrote:
> Andrew,
>
> On 29 Aug 2013, at 4:31 PM, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58276
>>
>> Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
>>
>> What |Removed |Added
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
>> Resolution|--- |INVALID
>>
>> --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
>> libgfortran.spec is part of the target library libgfortran so you need to
>> install the target libraries. If the build mechanism for Yocto/OE does not do
>> that, then it a bug there and not in GCC.
>
> Yes, this is exactly what I described in my post. The question I have is, what is the intended behavior of a GCC "make install-host" with regard to the functioning of the compilers. gcc and g++ are functional; gfortran is not. Is that what the GCC maintainers expect? Is that what the gfortran maintainers expect?
>
> Where can I read about the distinction between "make install", "make install-host", and "make install-target"? Is "make install-host" supposed to install usable compilers?
>
>> --
>> You are receiving this mail because:
>> You reported the bug.
>
>
> Larry Baker
> US Geological Survey
> 650-329-5608
> baker@usgs.gov
>
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list