[Bug c++/56936] gcc don't show error when accessing to missing member of current instantiation

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56936

--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-04-13 06:01:02 UTC ---
There is a Defect report about x<T> being considered a dependent (or
non-dependent) and I forget how that was resolved (if resolved yet at all).  If
it has not been resolved yet then both clang and GCC are correct.