[Bug c++/56815] void pointer arithmetic

[paolo.carlini at oracle dot com]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56815

--- Comment #21 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2013-04-04 10:12:11 UTC ---
Manuel, I'm adding the LangEnabledBy, to match the documentation. Thanks.

Now, I'm not sure to understand the existing lines (many):

  pedantic ? OPT_Wpedantic : OPT_Wpointer_arith

Do they imply that with -Wpedantic and -Wno-pointer-arith we emit such warnings
anyway? Is this intended?