[Bug target/54686] std::abs (long long) resorts to std::abs (double) if llabs is absent
paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Sun Sep 23 22:43:00 GMT 2012
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54686
--- Comment #15 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2012-09-23 22:43:02 UTC ---
Ok... thanks Marc for handling this. If we could handle in the same way
div(long long, long long), it would be great and more consistent. Are we sure
we can't?
Also, too bad that we don't use llabs (and lldiv) as implementation details
when safe, it would be more consistent with the long overloads. I seemed to
remember that we were already doing that.
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list