[Bug c++/55120] Inaccessible virtual base constructor does not prevent generation of default constructor
daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Mon Oct 29 19:20:00 GMT 2012
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55120
--- Comment #3 from Daniel Krügler <daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com> 2012-10-29 19:20:26 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> This is http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_closed.html#7 which was
> closed as NAD saying "This is what was intended" but I'm not sure what "this"
> is.
Not being Jason, but this one made curious: I think the "this" refers to "In
short, it looks like a class with a virtual private base can't be derived
from.". I double-checked by contacting Mike who confirmed that "There's no
special treatment for access in indirect virtual base classes"
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list