[Bug other/55309] gcc's address-sanitizer 66% slower than clang's

[jakub at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55309

--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-11-14 16:37:36 UTC ---
Also, this comparison doesn't have numbers for pure clang without
-fsanitize=address and gcc without -faddress-sanitizer, so likely most of the
speed differences can't be attributed just to asan.