[Bug c++/53505] [4.7/4.8 Regression] bitfield with bool type generated broken object file

[jakub at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53505

--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-05-28 13:39:12 UTC ---
That revision added:
+      /* But leave bitfield accesses alone.  */
+      && (root->offset % BITS_PER_UNIT) == 0)
Here root->offset % BITS_PER_UNIT is 0, still it is a bitfield and IMHO we
should leave it alone.  The question is how to differentiate bitfields at byte
boundary offsets from e.g. non-bitfield _Bool where it should be user's
responsibility to keep just 0 or 1 in the whole byte.