[Bug c++/53380] .ehframe could be smaller

[jakub at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53380

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-05-22 12:55:30 UTC ---
Adding default handling if there is no FDE is an ABI change, so can't be done
on existing architectures (except those that have that in their ABI already).

Why do you care about the .eh_frame size so much?  If you don't use the unwind
info, it often won't be even paged in, or can be discarded from RAM if needed. 
And if you need it, it better be accurrate.