[Bug middle-end/52693] Wrong code with SRA and arrays

[jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52693

--- Comment #4 from Martin Jambor <jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-03-23 22:45:47 UTC ---
OTOH, I can confirm that the problematic variable is value, just not
SRAing that one makes the testcase to return 120.  (In the same
function, SRA creates replacements also for stack and fifo variables
and that thus seems fine.)