[Bug regression/52696] New: [4.6 Regression]: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr44706.C scan-tree-dump-not fnsplit "Splitting function"
hp at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Fri Mar 23 22:30:00 GMT 2012
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52696
Bug #: 52696
Summary: [4.6 Regression]: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr44706.C
scan-tree-dump-not fnsplit "Splitting function"
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: regression
AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: hp@gcc.gnu.org
CC: hubicka@gcc.gnu.org
Host: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Target: cris-axis-elf
This test previously passed, now it fails.
A patch in the revision range (last_known_working:first_known_failing)
185724:185740
exposed or caused this regression. Since then it fails as follows:
Running /tmp/hpautotest-gcc46/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/dg.exp ...
...
FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr44706.C scan-tree-dump-not fnsplit "Splitting function"
The message in g++.log indicates that a log-entry from an optimizaton pass is
missing; something didn't happen. Maybe it's just the test-case that needs
updating, though that's only an uninitiated guess:
spawn /tmp/hpautotest-gcc46/cris-elf/gccobj/gcc/testsuite/g++/../../g++
-B/tmp/hpautotest-gcc46/cris-elf/gccobj/gcc/testsuite/g++/../../
/tmp/hpautotest-gcc46/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr44706.C -nostdinc++
-I/tmp/hpautotest-gcc46/cris-elf/gccobj/cris-elf/libstdc++-v3/include/cris-elf
-I/tmp/hpautotest-gcc46/cris-elf/gccobj/cris-elf/libstdc++-v3/include
-I/tmp/hpautotest-gcc46/gcc/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++
-I/tmp/hpautotest-gcc46/gcc/libstdc++-v3/include/backward
-I/tmp/hpautotest-gcc46/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/util -fmessage-length=0 -O3
-fdump-tree-fnsplit -S -isystem
/tmp/hpautotest-gcc46/cris-elf/gccobj/cris-elf/./newlib/targ-include -isystem
/tmp/hpautotest-gcc46/gcc/newlib/libc/include -o pr44706.s
PASS: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr44706.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr44706.C scan-tree-dump-not fnsplit "Splitting function"
Author of the only suspect patch in the revision range CC:ed.
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list