[Bug middle-end/52584] New: Fails to constant fold vector upper/lower half BIT_FIELD_REFs
rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Wed Mar 14 13:01:00 GMT 2012
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52584
Bug #: 52584
Summary: Fails to constant fold vector upper/lower half
BIT_FIELD_REFs
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo: rguenth@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: rguenth@gcc.gnu.org
Target: x86_64-*-*
int main()
{
int a = 1;
typedef int v4si __attribute__ ((vector_size (8 * sizeof(int))));
v4si x;
v4si y;
y = x + a;
foo(y);
return 0;
}
shows a missed optimization in how we fold BIT_FIELD_REFs that select
the upper/lower part of a vector:
<bb 2>:
D.1719_9 = BIT_FIELD_REF <x_4(D), 128, 0>;
D.1721_10 = BIT_FIELD_REF <{ 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1 }, 128, 0>;
D.1722_11 = D.1719_9 + D.1721_10;
D.1723_12 = BIT_FIELD_REF <x_4(D), 128, 128>;
D.1725_13 = BIT_FIELD_REF <{ 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1 }, 128, 128>;
D.1726_14 = D.1723_12 + D.1725_13;
y_5 = {D.1722_11, D.1726_14};
foo (y_5);
return 0;
we should have constant-folded D.1721_10 and D.1725_13.
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list