[Bug tree-optimization/43716] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Revision 158105 miscompiles doduc.f90

[ubizjak at gmail dot com]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43716

--- Comment #37 from Uros Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> 2012-07-21 13:51:59 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #36)
> > To me, it looks like invalid test. Any fortraners here to share their opinion?
> 
> Please read comments #23 and #24. One problem with NaN is that they propagate
> until something trap them. When did you get a successful compilation?

No, the first NaN was born exactly at this instruction.  Please note 0 / 0
which is the definition of NaN.