[Bug lto/53831] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Virtuals missing in LTO symtab

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53831

Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |andi-gcc at firstfloor dot
                   |                            |org

--- Comment #20 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-07-04 09:27:53 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #19)
> (In reply to comment #18)
> 
> > The testcase is fixed when using -fno-fat-lto-objects and gcc-ar
> 
> For me x64_64-linux version works if I use gcc-ar (both with and without
> -fno-fat-lto-objects).
> 
> > (which is not required, or should not be required(?) for -ffat-lto-objects?)
> 
> No idea, today is the first time I hear about gcc-nm/ar. Are there any online
> docs? Are users supposed to create LTO archives with gcc-ar instead of good ol'
> ar these days?

Good question, even I am not sure.  This is an area that could have
documentation.  Honza, Andi, can you clarify?