[Bug target/55516] strict volatile bitfields are done by what the ARM EABI says

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55516

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |wrong-code
          Component|regression                  |target
            Summary|strict volatile bitfields   |strict volatile bitfields
                   |are broken on ARM.          |are done by what the ARM
                   |                            |EABI says

--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-12-09 01:43:01 UTC ---
I think the ARM EABI is broken anyways.  Volatile bitfields in general are
broken for more than one reason.  I wish people would stop using them.