[Bug middle-end/55597] [4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: in plus_constant, at explow.c:88
ubizjak at gmail dot com
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Thu Dec 6 20:14:00 GMT 2012
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55597
--- Comment #12 from Uros Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> 2012-12-06 20:14:06 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> It works. Thanks.
>
> Unfortunately it creates GC garbage often unnecessary, when it won't be used at
> all.
I agree. Let's keep zext together with their users:
--cut here--
Index: i386.c
===================================================================
--- i386.c (revision 194263)
+++ i386.c (working copy)
@@ -12785,6 +12785,9 @@
tp = get_thread_pointer (Pmode, true);
dest = force_reg (Pmode, gen_rtx_PLUS (Pmode, tp, dest));
+ if (GET_MODE (x) != Pmode)
+ x = gen_rtx_ZERO_EXTEND (Pmode, x);
+
set_unique_reg_note (get_last_insn (), REG_EQUAL, x);
}
else
@@ -12793,15 +12796,20 @@
if (TARGET_64BIT)
{
- rtx rax = gen_rtx_REG (Pmode, AX_REG), insns;
+ rtx rax = gen_rtx_REG (Pmode, AX_REG);
+ rtx insns;
start_sequence ();
- emit_call_insn (ix86_gen_tls_global_dynamic_64 (rax, x,
- caddr));
+ emit_call_insn
+ (ix86_gen_tls_global_dynamic_64 (rax, x, caddr));
insns = get_insns ();
end_sequence ();
RTL_CONST_CALL_P (insns) = 1;
+
+ if (GET_MODE (x) != Pmode)
+ x = gen_rtx_ZERO_EXTEND (Pmode, x);
+
emit_libcall_block (insns, dest, rax, x);
}
else
@@ -12842,11 +12850,12 @@
if (TARGET_64BIT)
{
- rtx rax = gen_rtx_REG (Pmode, AX_REG), insns, eqv;
+ rtx rax = gen_rtx_REG (Pmode, AX_REG);
+ rtx insns, eqv;
start_sequence ();
- emit_call_insn (ix86_gen_tls_local_dynamic_base_64 (rax,
- caddr));
+ emit_call_insn
+ (ix86_gen_tls_local_dynamic_base_64 (rax, caddr));
insns = get_insns ();
end_sequence ();
@@ -12871,6 +12880,9 @@
{
dest = force_reg (Pmode, gen_rtx_PLUS (Pmode, dest, tp));
+ if (GET_MODE (x) != Pmode)
+ x = gen_rtx_ZERO_EXTEND (Pmode, x);
+
set_unique_reg_note (get_last_insn (), REG_EQUAL, x);
}
break;
--cut here--
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list