[Bug bootstrap/55571] [4.6/4.7/4.8 regression] PR48076 fix broke bootstrap on armv5tel-linux-gnueabi

[rth at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55571

Richard Henderson <rth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot       |rth at gcc dot gnu.org
                   |gnu.org                     |

--- Comment #5 from Richard Henderson <rth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-12-03 15:34:18 UTC ---
I think Jakub's idea is a bit overkill.  We're just in need of a
barrier, and we ought to be able to get one.  Perhaps we should
be linking libgcc_s.so itself against the static libgcc?

Although I can't recall why we're placing the __sync functions
in the static library in the first place.  It's not like they're
required to be unique.  I guess I'll have to dig that out of the
mail archives...