[Bug c++/33925] gcc -Waddress lost some useful warnings

[manu at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33925

--- Comment #7 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-04-20 12:57:59 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> ... That's not an argument against improving the warning though.  GCC's uses
> occur in system headers so warnings are suppressed, and could be worked around
> anyway with further extensions such as #pragma GCC diagnostic

Or even better, only skip the warning for functions marked as weakref, which I
guess is a very small subset. I think a patch that did that would be accepted. 

Unfortunately, Michael, I don't think there is anyone with enough free time to
work on this, so if you submitted a patch, that would be great! Thanks.