[Bug fortran/52916] [4.8 Regression] 481.wrf in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build

[burnus at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52916

Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |wrong-code
                 CC|                            |burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.8.0

--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-04-10 10:02:13 UTC ---
That's probably due to my patch for PR 40973 / PR 52751 (Rev. 186223). That
patch marked  functions/subroutines  and  variables from MODULES as
TREE_PUBLIC() = 0, if they have the PRIVATE attribute and no C-binding name.

That will definitely fail if one accesses the procedures directly, e.g. from C
via
"__moduleName_MOD_subroutine ();". The question is whether 481.wrf does so
(probably not). However, I fail to see how it could otherwise encounter the
problem.

As I do not have access to SPEC CPU, I would be happy if someone could provide
more information. (Best would be a test case.) As a first step: Are the missing
symbols procedures or (global) variables? Or both?