[Bug lto/50568] [4.7 Regression] Massive LTO failures

hjl.tools at gmail dot com gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Thu Sep 29 22:23:00 GMT 2011


--- Comment #21 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> 2011-09-29 22:20:02 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #20)
> HOST_WIDE_INT may not be 64bit on 32bit host.
> But long long is 64bit.  I don't think it is
> correct to use HOST_WIDE_INT in lto.

It may not be a problem since lto-plugin.c can use
long long for symbol ID encoded in section name by
lto.c even if HOST_WIDE_INT is 32bit.

More information about the Gcc-bugs mailing list