[Bug c++/47436] [C++0x] Variadic base-specifier-list of union rejected

[paolo.carlini at oracle dot com]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47436

Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID

--- Comment #8 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2011-09-22 22:46:26 UTC ---
Good, let's close this as invalid, then.

Thanks for clarifying the error_at thing, I should give it more thought: I was
under the impression that we tend to avoid (not a strict rule) things like
"error: unions cannot have base classes" because on a given line a lot can
happen (other errors together with good code) and an accurate column number is
anyway less convenient (for sure to a human like me!) than a name.