[Bug fortran/50407] compiler confused by .operator.
sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
Thu Sep 15 21:33:00 GMT 2011
--- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu> 2011-09-15 21:13:16 UTC ---
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 08:21:04PM +0000, zeccav at gmail dot com wrote:
> --- Comment #2 from Vittorio Zecca <zeccav at gmail dot com> 2011-09-15 20:21:04 UTC ---
> I believe the code is valid, and it has nothing to do with recursive I/O.
> If you comment out the write in the mul function gfortran still fails, so it
> does not depend on recursive I/O.
If I comment out the write statement and the 2.ip.8 statement,
you again have invalid code because the return value of the
function is never defined.
But, as I stated, I need to check the requirements of the
standard on recursive IO.
More information about the Gcc-bugs