[Bug c++/50785] [C++0x][constexpr] static constexpr double undefined reference

[paolo.carlini at oracle dot com]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50785

Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID

--- Comment #7 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2011-10-19 12:50:34 UTC ---
I think the important message to vehicle to the users - correct me if I'm wrong
- is that constexpr isn't "miraculous" from this point of view, old-style
static and C++11 static constexpr data members both generally require out of
class definitions.