[Bug target/51134] [4.7 Regression] x86 memset/memcpy expansion is broken

[hjl.tools at gmail dot com]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51134

--- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> 2011-11-22 16:34:54 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> Created attachment 25882 [details]
> Patch for new memset/memcpy implementation
> 
> (In reply to comment #9)
> > Regressions caused by the new memset/memcpy expansion are
> > 
> > FAIL: 27_io/basic_filebuf/seekoff/wchar_t/1.cc execution test
> > FAIL: 27_io/basic_filebuf/seekpos/wchar_t/9874.cc execution test
> > FAIL: 27_io/manipulators/basefield/char/1.cc execution test
> > FAIL: 27_io/manipulators/basefield/wchar_t/1.cc execution test
> > FAIL: 27_io/objects/wchar_t/12.cc execution test
> > FAIL: 27_io/objects/wchar_t/13.cc execution test
> > FAIL: events run
> > FAIL: gcc.target/i386/cleanup-1.c execution test
> > FAIL: gcc.target/i386/cleanup-2.c execution test
> > FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr34077.c (internal compiler error)
> > FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr34077.c (internal compiler error)
> > FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr34077.c (test for excess errors)
> > FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr34077.c (test for excess errors)
> > FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/arrayarg.f90 execution,  -O2
> > -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions -funroll-loops
> 
> With the attached patch fails on PR34077 and arrayarg.f90 are fixed, fails on
> cleanup-tests are probably caused by incorrect testcase (see
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49503).

Do you have a patch for those C++ and Java regressions?