[Bug tree-optimization/51058] [4.7 Regression] ICE: gimple check: expected gimple_assign(error_mark), have gimple_call() in gimple_assign_rhs_code, at gimple.h:1992
dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Wed Nov 9 18:33:00 GMT 2011
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51058
Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC|ira at gcc dot gnu.org |
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> 2011-11-09 18:27:58 UTC ---
> I guess it'd better be
>
> SUBROUTINE MLIST(MOLsp,PBCx,PBCy,PBCz, X0)
> IMPLICIT NONE
> INTEGER, PARAMETER :: NM=16384
> INTEGER :: MOLsp, i
> REAL :: PBCx, PBCy, PBCz, boxjmp, HALf=1./2.
> REAL :: X0(2,-2:NM)
>
> DO i = 1 , MOLsp
> boxjmp = PBCx*INT(X0(1,i)+SIGN(HALf,X0(1,i)))
> X0(1,i) = X0(1,i) - boxjmp
> boxjmp = PBCy*INT(X0(2,i)+SIGN(HALf,X0(2,i)))
> X0(2,i) = X0(2,i) - boxjmp
> ENDDO
> END
>
> otherwise it's an interleaving group of 3, which is only supported on NEON,
> AFAIK. I also changed the type to REAL to make it work (fail) on power.
Well, the original code in mdbx.f90 has the interleaving group of 3 (I only
changed the "decoration" around the loop to keep a valid code). When trying to
reduce the code removing one block made the ICE to disappear, but the above
test fails on x86_64 and not on ppc.
> (My GCC address is irar@gcc.gnu.org, and not ira@gcc.gnu.org).
Sorry! I'll try to remember it next time;-)
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list