[Bug c++/50976] [C++0x] literal operator with unsigned long long parameter not accepted
3dw4rd at verizon dot net
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Thu Nov 3 12:48:00 GMT 2011
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50976
--- Comment #4 from Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd at verizon dot net> 2011-11-03 12:47:41 UTC ---
I wonder if the testsuite was run when the gcc was built.
It should have raised a boatload of flags there.
Your test case runs like a charm on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ed@bad-horse:~/udlit_debug$ ../bin/bin/g++ -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=../bin/bin/g++
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/home/ed/bin/libexec/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.7.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc/configure --prefix=/home/ed/bin --with-gmp=/usr/local
--with-mpfr=/usr/local --with-mpc=/usr/local --with-ppl=/usr/local
--with-cloog=/usr/local --enable-cloog-backend=isl --enable-lto
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,go,lto,objc,obj-c++
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.7.0 20111031 (experimental) (GCC)
ed@bad-horse:~/udlit_debug$ ../bin/bin/g++ -std=c++0x -c main.cpp
ed@bad-horse:~/udlit_debug$
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I can't imagine how this could be target dependent though.
I wonder if build logs could be found.
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list