[Bug middle-end/49106] New: static variable is optimized away even though it is referenced by a nested constructor
burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Sun May 22 11:15:00 GMT 2011
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49106
Summary: static variable is optimized away even though it is
referenced by a nested constructor
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: burnus@gcc.gnu.org
In the following program, the function "test" is optimized way as the node is
not marked as needed. Thus, the static variable "a" is removed - even though it
is referenced in the nested constructor "_const_func".
Result: Link error:
/tmp/ccaIjMKk.o: In function `_const_func.1591':
test.c:(.text+0x6): undefined reference to `a.1589'
Expected: The local static should not be optimized way, i.e. the nested
function lowering should properly update the cgraph ipa reference list.
Side remark: For my purpose (coarray initialization in gfortran) it would be
best if in such a case both the function and the constructor could be optimized
away. Thus, if there would be some method on tree-level to tell this cgraph ...
main ()
{
void test (void)
{
static int a;
void __attribute__((constructor))
_const_func(void)
{
a = 7;
}
}
return 0;
}
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list