[Bug c/48951] probably, it is a bug.
paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Tue May 10 18:07:00 GMT 2011
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48951
Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2011-05-10 17:47:04 UTC ---
So, your expectations are wrong, because of course 4 < 1 is false, thus 0 as an
integer.
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list