[Bug c/48197] possible wrong code bug at -O0
regehr at cs dot utah.edu
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Fri Mar 18 20:20:00 GMT 2011
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48197
--- Comment #5 from John Regehr <regehr at cs dot utah.edu> 2011-03-18 20:14:51 UTC ---
Here's a test case:
int printf(const char *format, ...);
int main (void)
{
int y = 0x8000;
int x1 = (long)0 > ((unsigned int)0 ^ (signed short)y);
int x2 = (long)0 > ((unsigned int)0 ^ (signed short)((int)0x8000));
int x3 = (long)0 > ((unsigned int)0 ^ (signed short)0x8000);
int x4 = (long)0 > ((unsigned)0 ^ (unsigned)y);
int x5 = (long)0 > ((unsigned)0 ^ (unsigned)32768);
int x6 = (long)0 > (unsigned)32768;
int x7 = (long)0 > (long)32768;
int x8 = 0;
printf("%d %d %d %d %d %d %d %d\n",
x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6, x7, x8);
return 0;
}
And here's the output:
[regehr@gamow ~]$ current-gcc -O0 small.c -o small -Wall
[regehr@gamow ~]$ ./small
1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
I think 0 should be assigned into all of x1..x8.
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list