[Bug middle-end/48124] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] likely wrong code bug

[jakub at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48124

--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-03-14 22:09:29 UTC ---
On the adjusted testcase it started with
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115421
Before that the volatile bitfield was accessed just through 32-bit access (and
in 4.1 even with 16-bit access).