[Bug tree-optimization/47679] [4.6 Regression] Strange uninitialized warning after SRA

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47679

Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Priority|P3                          |P2
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2011.03.03 11:26:57
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-03-03 11:26:57 UTC ---
> Another thing is why the MEM_REF in the diagnostic isn't printed as
> aNewItem.m_storage.dummy_ or aNewItem.m_storage.dummy_.data or
> aNewItem.m_storage.

this is because it doesn't usually match the source and in some cases
is ambiguous.  It's by design.